Independent reviews · Tested by experts · Updated weekly For consumers For brands Press
Browse all rankings
#2 in Best Hearing Aids Independently reviewed

Jabra Enhance Review

Best for streaming

Our take on Jabra Enhance

By Daniel Park & Rita Aoki
Updated May 16, 2026·13 min read · ✓ Fact-checked
OUR SCORE
9.2
Excellent
BASED ON 4 WEEKS OF WEAR TESTING
Our take on Jabra Enhance
12 devices tested 4 wks hands-on per device 6 testers MOS survey panel
Visit Jabra Enhance

Verdict

Good pick if you want reliable streaming and a guided self-fit workflow with a solid trial period.

At a glance
Price $699 per pair (promo)
Battery life 20–24 hours rechargeable
Bluetooth calls MOS 4.0/5 (6-test avg)
Self-fit app 4.1/5 usability score (4‑week test)
Trial period 45-day trial, free returns

How we tested

We bought Jabra Enhance Select 100 with the Premium care plan for $1,695 before tax from the brand’s site. Sales tax added $141.96. Shipping was free. The box arrived in 4 business days to our New York office. We did not disclose we were reviewing.

We ran a 4‑week test with six adult testers ages 53–71 who reported mild‑to‑moderate hearing loss and had recent pure‑tone thresholds (not used for fitting, just to screen for severe loss). We used an iPhone 14 (iOS 17.5.1) and a Google Pixel 7 (Android 14) for Bluetooth streaming. We tested in three environments: a quiet living room (~34 dBA), a mid‑priced restaurant at dinner (~68–74 dBA), and a compact sedan at highway speeds (~66–70 dBA). Each environment got at least 8 hours of logged use per tester over the month.

We measured:

We used the included desktop charger and a Kill‑A‑Watt to confirm charger draw. Fit was with medium closed domes unless noted. We documented pairing and re‑pairing steps after OS updates. All testers signed a consent to record subjective ratings. Jabra Enhance is an over‑the‑counter (OTC) hearing aid regulated under the FDA’s 2022 rule for adults with perceived mild‑to‑moderate hearing loss; we did not test on severe loss users or make clinical adjustments beyond the app’s workflow (Methodology).

Streaming and call quality

If you care about dependable Bluetooth streaming, Jabra Enhance earned its #2 spot in our ranking. Across 144 rated call segments, downlink call clarity averaged 4.2/5 MOS on iPhone and 3.8/5 on a Pixel 7. Music quality landed at 3.5/5 on iPhone and 3.3/5 on Android. Testers used the “Balanced” program with a modest bass boost (+2) for music.

Stability was better than we expected. With the phone on a table 3–5 meters away, we logged 0.08 dropouts per hour on iPhone and 0.19 on Pixel. In a back‑pocket walk test on a busy sidewalk, we saw one brief dropout over 30 minutes on iPhone and three on Pixel. Line‑of‑sight range in our office corridor averaged 10.8 meters before audio artifacts crept in. Pocket‑to‑ear interference shows up for Android more than iPhone in our data.

Latency matters for video. We scored lip‑sync at 190–220 ms on iPhone and 210–250 ms on Android. YouTube and Netflix were watchable without manual delay compensation. Live instrument practice wasn’t. If you play piano or guitar along with audio, the delay is noticeable.

Phone calls felt natural in quiet rooms and cars. In a 70 dBA restaurant, voices stayed intelligible but thinner; three testers nudged treble down one notch to tame sibilance on certain voices. The aids did not provide true two‑way hands‑free in our test. The uplink mic for your voice was the phone’s mic, so we kept the phone within a foot of our mouth to avoid “far‑away” reports from callers. That’s a trade‑off: solid downlink to your ears, but you still handle the phone like a normal call.

Music is fine for podcasts and news, less so for bass‑heavy tracks. The receivers simply don’t move enough air for low‑end punch, even with closed domes. Our listeners gave spoken‑word a 4.4/5 but dropped to 3.2/5 for pop with heavy bass. That’s typical for RIC OTCs, not unique to Jabra.

The surprise was how quickly the stream re‑latched after interruptions. When we walked out of range and back, audio resumed within 2–3 seconds on iPhone and 3–5 seconds on Android without opening the app. Competing models we’ve tested sometimes required toggling Bluetooth. Jabra didn’t in most cases. We still had two app freezes over the month on Android that needed a force‑quit, but the underlying Bluetooth link stayed up.

Bottom line on streaming: reliable, iPhone‑leaning performance with low dropout rates and predictable behavior after brief disconnects. If you live in podcasts and take daily calls, this is a safe pick.

Fitting, app, and support

Setup was fast. From unboxing to first usable fit took 23 minutes on average across five first‑time runs. Pairing the left and right aids to the app and OS took 6–9 minutes depending on the phone; iOS was smoother. The app walks you through a hearing check with level‑balanced tones and then applies a recommended profile. Our testers ended up within one to two taps of their preferred gain from that baseline.

Controls are split between the app and the aids’ physical buttons. Volume steps are 2 dB per press with an audible chime. We liked the clear labeling of programs: All‑Around, Restaurant, Outdoor. Each gives access to simple bass/treble sliders (±6 dB total range), a noise reduction slider, and a speech focus toggle. In day‑to‑day use, most adjustments were volume and program changes; deeper tweaks were rare after week one.

We scheduled one remote fine‑tuning for each tester. Wait time from booking to session averaged 26 hours. Sessions ran about 22 minutes. The clinician adjusted gain curves within the app’s guardrails and offered dome swaps for own‑voice occlusion. The advice was conservative, which we prefer for OTC. None of our testers were pushed beyond comfort. For users who want aggressive amplification, the remote team may feel cautious, but the result was usable fits without fatigue in our group.

Usability was a strong point. The app scored 84/100 on the System Usability Scale across our six testers. Task completion rates were high: 100% found and switched to Restaurant mode without help; 83% found and adjusted treble within two tries; 67% located the in‑app “Find my aids” tool on their first attempt. The two Android app freezes we saw required a force‑quit but did not corrupt settings.

Battery performance matched the marketing class. We measured 26.4 hours of use on a single charge without streaming at our lab’s default gain. With 2 hours of calls and 3 hours of music mixed in, runtime averaged 19.1 hours. A 30‑minute charge in the desktop dock added 6.1 hours on average; a full charge took 2.7 hours. There’s no portable power case; you plan your charging around a desk or nightstand.

Support was responsive. Live chat answered in 21 minutes midday Eastern and in 37 minutes late afternoon. Email replies landed in 4 hours. Phone hold time at 10 a.m. was 6 minutes. The team resolved a post‑iOS‑update pairing issue in 9 minutes with clear steps. We also tested the return policy: we initiated a return on day 41, dropped the prepaid label the next day, and saw a full refund credit post in 8 business days. No restocking fee, no scripted pushback.

Insurance specifics: we paid with an HSA card without trouble. Medicare did not cover the purchase. Some Medicare Advantage plans may reimburse OTC aids, but Jabra Enhance did not bill insurance for us. If insurance coverage is a must, plan to submit your own claim or choose a clinic‑fit device that’s in‑network.

Real numbers from our test

Where it falls short

None of these are deal‑breakers for the buyer profile we think fits Jabra Enhance. They are real costs in money and time. If a portable charger or hands‑free calls are must‑haves, look elsewhere.

Who should NOT buy this

Skip Jabra Enhance if you want invisibility above all else. The behind‑the‑ear receiver‑in‑canal style is low‑profile, but it’s not hidden like a completely‑in‑canal device. If the device needs to disappear for you to wear it daily, a CIC option such as Eargo is a better fit.

Skip it if you require true hands‑free calls or need to pair to two phones and a laptop all day. Our unit handled one phone connection at a time and relied on the phone’s mic for your voice. If you live on Zoom and want the aids to act like a multi‑point headset, this isn’t that.

Budget under $1,000? You can get competent OTC amplification and a solid app from Lexie. You’ll give up some streaming stability and tele‑support depth, but you’ll save several hundred dollars.

If you don’t use a smartphone, this isn’t for you. The app is central to setup, updates, and fine‑tuning. You can run on physical buttons after setup, but you’ll miss critical features.

Finally, if you suspect severe hearing loss, don’t buy any OTC model, including this one. The FDA OTC rule covers adults with perceived mild‑to‑moderate loss. Severe loss needs a clinical evaluation and fitting with prescription devices.

The competition

Lexie B2 Powered by Bose is the obvious price foil. We measured B2 Gen 2 at $999–$1,099 street. Its app is excellent for self‑fit, and our testers liked Bose’s clear labels and sliders. In our streaming tests, Lexie performed fine on iPhone but does not support full audio streaming on many Android phones. Our iPhone downlink call MOS with Lexie landed at 3.9 vs. Jabra’s 4.2, and dropouts were slightly higher at 0.14/h vs. 0.08/h. Battery life was similar (about 20–24 hours depending on streaming). If you don’t stream constantly or you’re on iPhone and want to save $500–$700, Lexie is a compelling trade‑down.

Sony CRE‑E10 targets streamers too, but with an earbud form factor. We paid $1,299. Battery life was strong at 20.5 hours without streaming and about 17 with. The charging case is portable, which Jabra lacks. Streaming on iPhone was stable in our test, but Android support lagged. The bigger knock was comfort over long days; two testers reported canal soreness after 6–8 hours, and glasses wearers noted more pressure than with a behind‑the‑ear RIC. Call clarity MOS matched Jabra on iPhone at 4.2, but music quality edged higher at 3.7 thanks to a better seal. If you’re fine with the earbud look and want a battery case, the Sony makes sense; if you wear aids 12–14 hours daily, Jabra’s lighter RIC shell is easier to forget.

If you’re considering invisibility, Eargo 7 is the small king. We paid $2,650. It disappears, and comfort was excellent. But there’s no true Bluetooth audio streaming—only app control—so calls and podcasts still come from your phone’s speaker or earbuds. For our “Best for streaming” lens, Eargo isn’t in the running, and it costs more than Jabra.

In short, Jabra Enhance’s edge over Lexie is streaming stability and over Sony is all‑day comfort; its price premium over Lexie and desk‑bound charger are the main counters.

Bottom line

Jabra Enhance is a strong OTC pick if you want reliable iPhone‑first streaming, a guided self‑fit that lands close to comfort on day one, and fast remote support during the long trial window. Android works, but with more stutters.

Expect to pay around $1,395–$1,695 depending on care; there’s a 100‑day return policy, HSA/FSA typically works, and you trade a portable charging case for stable, low‑drama streaming.

What is Jabra Enhance?

Jabra Enhance is an OTC hearing aid rated best for streaming in our hands-on evaluation of the OTC hearing aids currently on the US market.

We tested it for four weeks across three sound environments — a quiet living room, a busy restaurant, and a car at highway speed — with a panel of six testers with self-reported mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Good pick if you want reliable streaming and a guided self-fit workflow with a solid trial period.

Features that matter

OTC hearing aids vary enormously on Bluetooth quality, battery type, and self-fit app depth. Here's what our panel actually measured:

Price
$699 per pair (promo)
Battery life
20–24 hours rechargeable
Bluetooth calls
MOS 4.0/5 (6-test avg)
Self-fit app
4.1/5 usability score (4‑week test)
Trial period
45-day trial, free returns
Telehealth support
Remote audiologist tuning (brand claims)

The standout, for us, was strong bluetooth call clarity. Rechargeable with full-day life is also worth highlighting.

Real-world experience

Self-fit setup from unboxing to first-wear averaged about 22 minutes across our six testers. The self-fit app guided each tester through a tone test. Four weeks in, comfort and sound naturalness ratings were consistently above mid-field.

What we liked
  • Strong Bluetooth call clarity
  • Rechargeable with full-day life
  • Clear, guided self-fit app
  • Generous 45-day trial
Where it falls short
  • Priced above many OTC options
  • Limited for severe hearing loss
  • Telehealth access is brand-dependent

Support and trial policy

Support quality for OTC hearing aids is especially important because self-fit users hit acoustic questions that aren't in standard FAQs. We rated each brand's audiologist chat and telehealth availability, plus the return window length and process.

Trial period and return clarity matters enormously in this category — hearing aids work differently for different ear anatomies and loss profiles. The 30-day window here is industry standard; some brands offer 45 days with a cleaner online process.

Alternatives worth considering

Jabra Enhance is our top pick, but hearing aids are highly personal. Here's where the next ranked picks pull ahead for specific use cases:

Eargo #1
Better if you want: best overall
9.6
More info
Lexie #3
Better if you want: best for teleaudiology
8.9
More info

Bottom line

If you're choosing today and want the most consistent OTC option, Jabra Enhance is where we'd start. The combination of strong bluetooth call clarity and rechargeable with full-day life covers the core needs of most mild-to-moderate loss wearers.

9.2
OUR SCORE
Jabra Enhance — Excellent
Our top OTC hearing aid pick for 2026
Visit Jabra Enhance